A Guide to Negative Gearing for Australian Investors
- Feb 3
- 12 min read
Negative gearing is a term you hear a lot in Australian investment circles, especially when the conversation turns to property. In simple terms, it's a strategy where the costs of owning an investment—like mortgage interest, council rates, and maintenance—add up to more than the rental income it brings in. This creates a net rental loss.
The key part of this strategy, under Australian tax law, is that this loss isn't just a number on a spreadsheet. You can often use it to reduce your other taxable income, like your salary, which in turn can lower your overall tax bill for the year. This article is based on the Current Financial Year at the time of writing.
At Baron Tax & Accounting, we often see Brisbane clients carefully weighing the cash flow implications of negative gearing against the long-term potential for capital growth. A common observation is that successful investors maintain meticulous records from day one, which simplifies their tax obligations and maximises their legitimate claims. This disciplined approach is crucial for navigating the financial pressures of holding an asset that doesn't generate a positive income stream.
Understanding the Core Concept of Negative Gearing

Negative gearing is best understood as a long-term wealth creation strategy, not a method for generating immediate income. The focus is on the future capital growth of the property rather than month-to-month rental profit.
Essentially, investors willingly accept a short-term cash flow shortfall. They do this with the expectation that the property's value will climb significantly over time, leading to a healthy profit when it’s eventually sold.
Think of it as a strategic trade-off. You might be paying out of your own pocket each month to cover the gap between the rent you receive and your expenses. However, the tax savings you receive from claiming the loss help to cushion that financial impact. The ultimate aim is for the capital gain you make from the sale to far exceed all those smaller, cumulative losses you covered along the way.
Key Elements of a Negative Gearing Strategy
For this approach to be effective, several key components must be in place:
Deductible Expenses: These are the running costs you can claim against your rental income. This includes loan interest, council rates, insurance, property management fees, and repairs. For a comprehensive list, you can learn more about the specific rental property deductions you can claim.
Net Rental Loss: This is the result of a simple calculation at the end of the financial year when your total deductible expenses are higher than your gross rental income.
Other Taxable Income: To gain a tax benefit, you need another source of income to offset the rental loss against—most commonly a salary or business profits.
Capital Growth: This is the most critical element. The entire strategy relies on the property's value increasing over the long term. If there's no solid capital growth, you may not recoup the losses accumulated.
The core idea is simple: a short-term, tax-deductible loss is accepted in exchange for the potential of a much larger, long-term capital gain. This makes property selection in high-growth areas, like certain Brisbane suburbs, a critical factor for success.
This is not a strategy to enter into lightly. It demands careful financial planning and a solid understanding of your cash flow. You must be prepared to fund the ongoing shortfall for an extended period, which could be several years. It is not a get-rich-quick scheme, but a measured investment approach that relies on smart market choices and disciplined financial management.
How Negative Gearing Works in Practice

Let's break down the practical mechanics. The process involves a few key steps: adding up your deductible expenses, calculating your net rental loss for the year, and then using that loss to reduce your taxable income.
Understanding the various tax deduction strategies for rental properties is essential to ensure you are claiming everything you are entitled to.
Let's consider a practical example. Alex is a project manager in Brisbane earning a $120,000 salary. Alex has recently purchased an investment apartment and wants to apply this strategy.
Step 1: Tallying Up the Income and Expenses
First, we need to get a clear picture of the property's finances over a full financial year. This means adding up all rental income and all deductible expenses.
Annual Rental Income: Alex’s apartment is leased for $550 per week. Over 52 weeks, that brings in a total income of $28,600.
Annual Deductible Expenses: Diligent record-keeping is vital. Alex has tracked every cost associated with the investment property.
Expense Category | Annual Cost |
|---|---|
Mortgage Interest Payments | $25,000 |
Council Rates | $1,800 |
Water Rates | $1,200 |
Strata / Body Corporate Fees | $4,500 |
Landlord Insurance | $800 |
Property Management Fees (8%) | $2,288 |
Repairs and Maintenance | $1,500 |
Total Deductible Expenses | $37,088 |
A crucial point here: it's only the interest portion of the mortgage repayments that is deductible, not the principal amount being paid down. We cover this in more detail in our guide to claiming borrowing expenses.
Step 2: Calculating the Net Rental Loss
With all figures available, we can calculate the property's "on-paper" performance for the ATO.
Net Rental Loss = Total Rental Income - Total Deductible ExpensesFor Alex, the calculation is:
$28,600 (Income) - $37,088 (Expenses) = -$8,488 (Net Rental Loss)
This $8,488 figure is the key number in negative gearing. It represents the shortfall Alex covered during the year, but it also unlocks a tax benefit.
Step 3: Using the Loss to Reduce Taxable Income
This is where the strategy provides a direct financial benefit. The net rental loss is subtracted directly from Alex’s salary, reducing the amount of income on which tax is paid.
Before Negative Gearing:
Taxable Income: $120,000
After Negative Gearing:
Original Taxable Income: $120,000
Less Net Rental Loss: -$8,488
New Taxable Income: $111,512
By negatively gearing the property, Alex has lowered his taxable income by $8,488. The final tax bill for the year will now be calculated on this lower amount, leading to a tax saving. The exact refund depends on Alex's marginal tax rate, but the outcome is a reduced tax liability.
This example shows how a paper loss from an investment property creates a tangible tax benefit, which helps offset the cash shortfall from holding the property and makes the long-term strategy of pursuing capital growth more sustainable.
Who Actually Uses Negative Gearing in Australia?

There is a common misconception that negative gearing is a tax loophole used exclusively by the very wealthy. However, Australian tax data reveals a different story. It is a strategy employed by many everyday Australians to build long-term financial security.
The reality is that a significant number of property investors who use this strategy are on moderate, salaried incomes. They view property as a viable path to a more secure retirement, and the tax benefits of negative gearing make that journey more accessible.
The Real Demographics of Negative Gearing
Official data consistently shows that the majority of people who negatively gear properties are middle-income earners. Currently, around 1.2 million Australians use negative gearing for their investment properties.
Notably, two-thirds of these investors have a taxable income of $120,000 or less. This challenges the narrative that negative gearing is only for high-income earners and demonstrates its role as a mainstream wealth-creation strategy. For many families, the tax relief it provides is what makes property investment achievable.
The data is clear: 770,000 people who use negative gearing earn less than $80,000 a year. This indicates the strategy is an important part of building wealth for everyday Australians, not just a benefit for the top one percent.
Who Are These Everyday Investors?
Breaking down the data by profession further illustrates that this is a strategy for the wider community.
Teachers: More than 28,000 teachers across Australia use negative gearing to plan for their future.
Nurses and Midwives: Over 27,600 of these healthcare professionals use the strategy as part of a long-term investment plan.
Defence Force Members and Police Officers: Essential service members are also common users, seeking to build financial stability for their families.
These are not high-net-worth speculators; they are ordinary people working in our communities. For many, a single investment property is a cornerstone of their retirement plan, not part of a sprawling portfolio. They are playing the long game, using a legislated tax strategy to help them build wealth.
These decisions often involve careful consideration of their family's future, sometimes including different ownership structures.
Ultimately, the typical negatively geared investor is far from the stereotype. It is much more likely to be your neighbour—a teacher, a nurse, or a small business owner—than a corporate giant. This reality is crucial to understanding the role negative gearing plays in the Australian investment landscape.
Weighing the Benefits and Risks

Negative gearing is not a guaranteed path to wealth. It is a calculated strategy involving a direct trade-off: accepting immediate, ongoing costs in the hope of achieving a larger long-term gain.
The entire strategy rests on the crucial assumption that short-term, tax-deductible losses will eventually be outweighed by long-term capital growth. This is never certain and requires serious financial planning, a cash buffer for unexpected events, and a solid understanding of the property market. It is essential to consider both the potential upsides and the real risks.
The Upside: Pros of Negative Gearing
Tax Reduction: The most immediate benefit is tax relief. Any net loss from your property can be claimed against other income, reducing your taxable income and lowering your annual tax bill.
Capital Growth: The primary goal is long-term capital appreciation. The aim is to acquire an asset that increases in value over time, resulting in a significant capital gain upon sale.
Asset Accumulation: It provides a structured way to build a tangible asset portfolio for long-term wealth creation.
The Downside: Cons of Negative Gearing
Negative Cash Flow: The strategy requires you to cover the financial shortfall from your own pocket each month. A sudden job loss, a rise in interest rates, or a major repair can create significant financial stress.
Market Risk: The strategy is dependent on the property's value increasing. If the market stagnates or declines, you could be left funding ongoing losses with no prospect of a future capital gain.
Interest Rate Risk: A rise in interest rates can significantly increase your holding costs and widen the cash flow gap.
Liquidity Risk: Property is an illiquid asset. Selling quickly without incurring a loss can be difficult if you need urgent access to cash.
Diagram: The Negative Gearing Trade-Off
[Personal Funds] + [Rental Income] ---> [Property Expenses (Mortgage Interest, Rates, etc.)]
| |
| V
+-----> [Shortfall / Net Loss] ----> [Reduces Taxable Income] ----> [Tax Saving]
|
V
[Long-Term Capital Growth]Ultimately, negative gearing magnifies both potential gains and potential losses. A careful, honest assessment of your financial position, risk tolerance, and investment timeline is the critical first step.
A Look Back: The History and Economic Role of Negative Gearing
To understand why negative gearing is such a debated topic in Australia, it is useful to look at its history and economic impact. The strategy's origins are long-standing, but a significant policy change in the mid-1980s highlighted its influence on the property market.
The ongoing debate centres on two competing arguments: its impact on housing affordability versus its role in encouraging private investment in the rental market. Supporters argue it increases rental supply, while critics claim it inflates property prices, disadvantaging first-home buyers.
The Great Policy Experiment of the Mid-1980s
A key historical event occurred under the Hawke Labor government. On 1 July 1985, the government abolished the ability for property investors to deduct rental losses against their other income.
The market's reaction was swift and significant. Investment in rental properties dropped, construction of new rental housing slowed, and vacancy rates tightened across the country, leading to sharp rent increases, particularly in major cities. This period served as a real-world test of the policy's impact.
Facing a rental crisis, the government reversed its decision, and negative gearing was reinstated in September 1987. Investment returned to the market, and the rental supply began to recover.
The Debate Rages On
The events of the 1980s continue to shape today's arguments. Proponents use it as a case study to argue that negative gearing is essential for maintaining a healthy supply of rental homes. Their logic is that without this tax incentive, fewer people would invest in rental properties, leading to higher rents.
However, there is another perspective. Economists and housing advocates raise concerns about the broader economic consequences.
The main criticism is that negative gearing, especially when combined with the Capital Gains Tax (CGT) discount, encourages investors to purchase existing properties rather than fund new construction. This can drive up the prices of existing homes without increasing the overall housing supply, making it more difficult for first-home buyers to enter the market.
This tension between supporting rental supply and maintaining housing affordability is why negative gearing remains one of Australia's most fiercely debated economic policies. Understanding this history helps investors appreciate how sensitive the strategy is to political change and how it can shape the market.
Meeting Your ATO Compliance Obligations
Successfully managing a negatively geared property involves more than just selecting the right real estate. Meticulous compliance with the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) is essential. The ATO closely monitors rental property deductions, meaning your record-keeping must be robust to justify any losses you claim.
The Foundation of Compliance: Your Record-Keeping Checklist
The fundamental rule is that if you cannot prove an expense, you cannot claim it. Your documents are your evidence. The best practice is to maintain a dedicated system for all records from the moment you consider purchasing a property.
Here’s a practical checklist of the essential documents you must keep:
Property Acquisition Records: Contract of sale, conveyancing documents, and proof of stamp duty. These are vital for calculating your cost base for Capital Gains Tax (CGT).
Loan Documentation: All loan agreements, statements showing interest paid, and records of any borrowing expenses. Remember, only the interest component of your mortgage repayments is deductible.
Proof of Rental Income: Copies of lease agreements and bank statements showing rental payments.
All Expense Receipts: Every receipt for costs such as council rates, water bills, strata levies, insurance, property management fees, and invoices for repairs and maintenance.
Maintaining organised, comprehensive records isn't just good practice—it's a legal requirement. The ATO can request records dating back five years from the date you lodge your tax return.
Distinguishing Repairs from Capital Improvements
A common area of confusion for property investors is the difference between an immediately deductible repair and a capital improvement, which must be depreciated over several years.
Repairs (Immediately Deductible): Expenses to fix wear and tear or damage, restoring the property to its original condition. Examples include repairing a broken hot water system or fixing a leaky tap.
Capital Works/Improvements (Depreciated Over Time): Expenses that enhance the property's value or change its character. This includes a full kitchen renovation or installing a new air conditioning system. These costs are claimed over many years.
The impact of negative gearing on the national budget is significant, which is why the ATO scrutinises these claims carefully. Recent analysis shows the strategy contributes to billions in forgone tax revenue each year, underscoring the importance of precise, compliant records. You can explore data on the fiscal costs of tax expenditures for more information.
Summary of Key Takeaways
Negative gearing is a significant financial strategy with both benefits and risks. Success depends on careful planning, strong cash flow management, and a long-term investment horizon.
Core Concept: A net rental loss is used to reduce your other taxable income, providing an annual tax benefit.
Primary Goal: The strategy relies on achieving long-term capital growth that outweighs the accumulated short-term losses.
Cash Flow is Key: You must be financially prepared to cover the ongoing shortfall between rental income and property expenses.
Market Risk is Real: The strategy's success is tied to property market performance; a stagnant or declining market poses a significant risk.
Compliance is Non-Negotiable: Meticulous record-keeping is a legal requirement and essential for justifying your claims to the ATO.
Not Just for the Wealthy: ATO data shows that the majority of users are middle-income Australians.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
What is the difference between negative and positive gearing?
The key difference is cash flow. With negative gearing, your property's expenses are greater than its rental income, creating a loss. With positive gearing, the rental income is higher than the expenses, generating a profit. The profit is added to your taxable income, while the loss can be used to reduce it.
How does Capital Gains Tax (CGT) affect a negatively geared property?
When you sell the property, any profit (capital gain) is subject to CGT. The goal of negative gearing is for this capital gain to be significantly larger than the total losses incurred over the holding period. If you have owned the asset for more than 12 months, you may be eligible for a 50% CGT discount, meaning you only pay tax on half of the gain.
Can I claim travel expenses to inspect my rental property?
No. The ATO changed the rules, and travel expenses incurred to inspect, maintain, or collect rent for a residential rental property are no longer deductible. It is always best to confirm current rules with the ATO as tax laws can change.
Does negative gearing only apply to property?
No. The principle of negative gearing can apply to any income-producing asset purchased with borrowed money, such as shares or managed funds. If the interest paid on a margin loan for shares exceeds the dividend income, the resulting net investment loss may be used to offset other taxable income.
Is negative gearing a good idea?
Whether negative gearing is a good idea depends entirely on an individual's financial circumstances, risk tolerance, and investment goals. It can be an effective wealth-creation tool if the property experiences strong capital growth, but it carries significant cash flow and market risks.
ATO Official Guidance Reference
For direct information from the Australian Taxation Office regarding rental property income and expenses, please refer to the following official resource:
Need clarity on your situation?
The information provided in this guide is general in nature and is intended for educational purposes only. Tax laws are complex, and the application of strategies like negative gearing can vary significantly based on your personal financial situation, income level, and investment structure.
To make an informed decision, it's important to consider your own circumstances. Seeking personalised advice from a qualified tax professional can help you understand how these rules apply to you and ensure your investment strategy is structured correctly for both compliance and your long-term goals.
Baron Tax & Accounting
Website: https://www.baronaccounting.com
Email: info@baronaccounting.com
Phone: +61 1300 087 213
Whatsapp: 0450 468 318
